Searching for the right credential
A bid needs three relevant projects with dates, scope and outcomes. The facts exist, spread across old proposals, project folders and one director's memory.
Not every team has every one of these. They are the situations that usually prompt the conversation.
A bid needs three relevant projects with dates, scope and outcomes. The facts exist, spread across old proposals, project folders and one director's memory.
The method for the service has barely changed, but every bid team writes it again, with small differences nobody approved.
The specialist sees the draft two days before submission and rewrites half of it. The bid goes in, and the next one starts the same way.
We follow the path from a qualified opportunity to an approved proposal, and look at where specialist time goes along it.
An anonymised scenario drawn from patterns across our past work, showing how this kind of problem gets solved. Named projects follow further down the page.
We take one service you bid for regularly and build the reusable material and review process behind its proposals.
Scope, fee, timing and how much of your team's time it needs are agreed in writing before any work starts.
During scoping we agree a baseline for each measure from your own records, then compare at the end. We do not promise a percentage before we have seen the work.
Senior time spent per proposal.
From decision to bid to submission-ready draft.
Time spent finding credentials and references.
Drafts exchanged before approval.
Work by the people behind ECM.DEV, chosen because the workflow is similar, not because the sector is identical. Each case study says how it was delivered, and client names do not imply endorsement.
Moved a consultancy from unevenly written, single-language material to a bilingual site backed by a defined content system. Proposal material needs the same agreed source.
Read the case studyTranslated deep technical capability into language an industrial buyer could act on, working directly with the engineers who held it.
Read the case study
Founder · Fractional content operations lead
I help your team turn specialist knowledge into clear, approved material and repeatable workflows. That means connecting the people, information and systems needed to keep content useful across buying journeys and markets.
Start with one defined project. If you need continued support, I can lead agreed priorities, coordinate contributors and keep approvals and improvements moving, with a scope and rhythm that fit your team.
In a consultancy, that means protecting specialist time: they decide, we assemble.
A scoping conversation is about the work in front of you: which workflow, which material, who needs to be involved. If a first project makes sense, you receive a written scope and fee. If it does not, we say so.
A completed project with nothing further is a good outcome. Ongoing support is there if you want it, not a condition of starting.